Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
【USA輸入】ヴィンテージ JUDY LEE ブルー オーロラ フラワー イヤリング/Vintage JUDY LEE Blue Aurora Flower Clip On Earrings1970JUDY LEE >> (7) JUDY LEE() 1950Branch Ette19701980 JUDY LEE>> 1970 H 3. 4cm x W 3. 3cm Judy Lee15g()
1970年代のJUDY LEEのフラワーモチーフイヤリング。
繊細なテクスチャーが施されたシックなシルバートーンメタルに、大ぶりのオーロラストーン、忘れな草のようなブルーのラインストーンがセットされています。
オーロラストーンはブルー、グリーン、パープル・・と角度によって異なるミステリアスな輝きを見せ、思わず視線を惹きつけられる美しさ。不揃いな花びらのフォルムから、自然の花々の姿が感じられるのも素敵です。
身に纏えば、耳元で大輪の青い花が咲いているよう。ブレスレットとのセットコーディネートもぜひお楽しみください。
ストーンが一石のみ修理されており(写真7枚目〇部分)、他のストーンと僅かに色味が異なるため価格に反映させていただいております。また、イヤリング裏側のメタルに経年感がございます。その他良好なヴィンテージコンディションです。
【JUDY LEE(ジュディ・リー)とは】
1950年代後半にシカゴで設立されたBranch-Ette社の商標。1970年代にかけてホームパーティー形式でジュエリーを販売し、人気を博しました。花のモチーフ、ヴィクトリアン調のスタイルや、アンティーク仕上げのメタルに高品質のラインストーンを使用した華やかなデザインが特徴。ブランドは1980年代に閉業しました。
JUDY LEEジュエリー一覧はこちら>>
※当店で扱っている商品は、ヴィンテージのアイテムです。目立つ傷や汚れは記載しておりますが、状態の良いお品でも、経年に伴う小傷や汚れ等がある場合がございます。新品とは異なるヴィンテージ特有の風合いとして、ご理解頂けますようお願い申し上げます。
ヴィンテージ・コスチュームジュエリー
年代：1970年代
サイズ：H 約3.4cm x W 約3.3cm
素材：メタル、ラインストーン
刻印：Judy Lee
重さ：15g(片耳)
輸入元：アメリカ
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 829 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
How to capture the import of an entire war by writing on its end
Format: Kindle
The authors seamlessly cover ed the macro and micro accounts of events and participants to capture the stunning and all important end of WWII. I was engaged and stimulated throughout my read of this book and highly recommend it for enthusiasts who are conversant with the war and want a better understanding of its close.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 27, 2025
★★★★★ 4
World War II - The Final Months
Format: Hardcover
The book takes you through the final months of World War II, focusing on eight key moments when the fighting finally came to an end. It’s not just a dry rundown of facts or battle maps — the authors do a great job of bringing the people involved to life, from famous leaders to everyday soldiers and civilians caught in the chaos.
What I really liked was how the story moves around the globe, covering Europe, the Pacific, and beyond. It keeps the narrative fresh and exciting, giving a real sense of how the war unfolded on many fronts at once. Sometimes I had to pay close attention to keep up with all the locations and characters, but that only added to the feeling of being caught up in a fast-moving, gripping story rather than a history lesson.
What stood out most was how it made me feel the human side of history—the fear, the relief, and the confusion as the war finally ended. It’s full of details, but it never felt boring or too technical.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 19, 2025
★★★★★ 5
The Fix
Format: Hardcover
An insightful and interesting book on how our country's first legislators try to make sense of the new and fairly short U.S. Constitution, which, being drafted by humans, was bound to be imperfect. A lack of clarity on some point might be due to the changeable nature of words themselves or to confusion or obscurity of thought by the authors. And, who were the authors? The men in the room who came up with the product or the various state conventions that approved the final product?
Professor Gienapp writes well and with a fine grasp of his subject. He uses concrete examples to illustrate his main points. For example, Congressional debates over the constitutionality of a proposed federal bank, the ratification of Jay's Treaty, and even whether the Bill of Rights was to be incorporated into or simply added to the original document.
Most people think of U.S. constitutional history in terms of its drafting and ratification and/or its later judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court. Here, Professor Gienapp focuses on the initial work of interpretation by the first few sessions of Congress.
This book is essential reading for those interested in the U.S. Constitution and the internal architecture of our government. I think those who spend countless hours viewing frenetic talking heads say this or that about the constitutionality of some issue or another (or the nomination of a justice to the High Court) should throw their television set out the window and, instead, settle into a corner chair and calmly read this and other such thoughtful books.
This one should win prizes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2018
★★★★★ 5
Excellent Book
Format: Hardcover
Stanford University History Professor Gienapp has done an outstanding job of researching and writing this historical analysis of the interpretation of the American Constitution by America's first Congress. Professor Gienapp analyzes data primarily from Congress's problems interpreting the removable of executive officers, chartering a national bank and approval of the 1794 Treaty with Great Britain negotiated by Chief Justice John Jay, the "Jay Treaty." Gienapp shows in clear writing how Congress used records of the debates at the Constitutional Convention and State Ratification Conventions to resolve these constitutional issues. I highly recommend this book to anyone concerned with the interpretation of the American Constitution.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 18, 2020
★★★★★ 5
An analysis of how we came to think about the Constitution the way we do
Format: Kindle
It provides a detailed analysis of the arguments used to talk about the Constitution in the ten years after it was ratified. These arguments shifted from treating it as a preliminary draft to be perfected through filling in the details of the operation of the government through experience, to a sacred document that had to be interpreted to determine its "true" meaning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2018